The Evolution of Social Interaction Patterns in the Digital Age: Examining the Influence of Technology Mediated Communication
Keywords:
Digital Age, Social Interaction Patterns, Influence of Technology, Mediated CommunicationSynopsis
In the contemporary digital perspective, social interaction patterns undergo continual transformation due to the pervasive influence of technology-mediated communication. This research aims to explore the intricate dynamics of social interactions in the digital age and elucidate the multifaceted impact of technology-mediated communication on human communication behaviors. Drawing upon interdisciplinary research from psychology, sociology, and communication studies, this paper examines the evolution of social interaction patterns within virtual environments. The advent of digital platforms has revolutionized traditional modes of communication, providing novel avenues for interpersonal engagement and connectivity. Through an analytical lens, this research assesses the implications of technology-mediated communication on social cohesion, identity formation, and interpersonal relationships. Additionally, it investigates the role of digital interfaces in shaping communicative norms and etiquettes, considering both the merits and drawbacks of virtual interaction modalities. Furthermore, this study delves into the nuanced interplay between technology and social cognition, unraveling the cognitive processes underlying digital communication practices. By elucidating the complexities of online social dynamics, this research offers insights into the transformative potential of technology-mediated communication on human sociality, paving the way for future research endeavors in the burgeoning field of digital communication studies.
References
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Carey, J. W. (1988). Chapter 1: A cultural approach to communication. In J. W. Carey, Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Routledge. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (n.d.). Oral Assessment Rubrics. Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/pdfrubrics/oralass.pdf
Oxford University Press. (2007). Narrate, v. In Oxford English Dictionary Online.
Perl, B., Murray, K., & Lutrick, K. (Eds.). (2005). Written English For You. Emerald Publishers.
Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W., Jr. (1979). Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, Uses. Hastings House.
Sundararajan, N. (2001, March 19-25). Attentive Listening – How it Matters. University News, 39(12), 8-10.
Sundararajan, N. Spoken English – How to Enrich it.
Taylor, A., et al. (1989). Communicating. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. (2000).
Wark, M. (1997). The Virtual Republic. Allen and Unwin St Leonards. Witzany, G. (2006). Plant Communication from Biosemiotic Perspective. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 1(4), 169-178.
Witzany, G. (2006). Plant Communication from Biosemiotic Perspective. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 1(4), 169-178.
Witzany, G. (2007). Applied Biosemiotics: Fungal Communication. In G. Witzany (Ed.), Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts (pp. 295-301). Helsinki:
Umweb. Witzany, G. (2007). Applied Biosemiotics: Fungal Communication. In G. Witzany (Ed.), Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts (pp. 295-301). Helsinki: Umweb.
Downloads
Published
October 21, 2024
Copyright (c) 2024 Sharmila K, Sathya R, Suresh L, Vigneshwaran C (Author)
Details about this monograph
ISBN-13 (15)
9789393518316
How to Cite
K, S., R, S. ., L, S., & C, V. (2024). The Evolution of Social Interaction Patterns in the Digital Age: Examining the Influence of Technology Mediated Communication. IOR INTERNATIONAL PRESS. https://doi.org/10.34256/ior243
